Re: Porting MOO objects

• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 14:33:37 PST
• From:
  tom@mvision.com (Tom Ritchford)
• Reply-To:
  tom@mvision.com
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951129135353.9368A-100000@yeehaw.com> (message from Bill Garrett on Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:01:13 PST)

Defender (Bill Garrett <bill@yeehaw.com> writes:
>> Not true. Its a bit buggy to get working sometimes and it does have 
>> problems with massive lag but all in all it works.. I've used it alot 
>> porting stuff between the two of the moo's I'm a wizard on.
>
>Autoport's setup routine was kinna tweaky for awhile, but the version on 
>RiverMOO (river.honors.indiana.edu 8888) has been fixed.
>I've been working on a more robust version of a porting system, contained 
>on an object rather than in one verb.
>The version on River also checks to see if your MOO's nameserver 
>processes are down, and warns you accordingly.
>I've used the verb successfully for a long time.

Great agreement here.  I used the new utilities to do a massive
port of several hundred objects and characters with great success.

What the MOO world needs is a correspondance database of MOO objects
between MOOs...

    /t

Tom Ritchford     tom@mvision.com   (212) 306-0414 
Market Vision, 40 Rector Street, NY, NY 10006

Verge's "Little Idiot" -- Music for the mentally peculiar.
1-800-WEIRDOS           http://www.fly.net/~tom/verge.html

• Re: Porting MOO objects
• From: Bill Garrett <bill@yeehaw.com>

• Prev: Re: Porting MOO objects
• Next: Re: Porting MOO objects
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows