Re: Porting MOO objects

• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:01:13 PST
• From:
  Bill Garrett <bill@yeehaw.com>
• cc: batman@epix.net, Moocows List <moo-cows@parc.xerox.com>
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951129115859.1709A-100000@vespucci.iquest.com>

> Not true. Its a bit buggy to get working sometimes and it does have 
> problems with massive lag but all in all it works.. I've used it alot 
> porting stuff between the two of the moo's I'm a wizard on.

Autoport's setup routine was kinna tweaky for awhile, but the version on 
RiverMOO (river.honors.indiana.edu 8888) has been fixed.
I've been working on a more robust version of a porting system, contained 
on an object rather than in one verb.
The version on River also checks to see if your MOO's nameserver 
processes are down, and warns you accordingly.
I've used the verb successfully for a long time.

Def.

• Re: Porting MOO objects
• From: tom@mvision.com (Tom Ritchford)
• Re: Porting MOO objects
• From: Graeme Smith <grysmith@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>

• Re: Porting MOO objects
• From: Edward Goff <egoff@iquest.com>

• Prev: Re: Porting MOO objects
• Next: Re: Porting MOO objects
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows