Re: scheduler question

• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 09:38:56 PST
• From:
  Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>
• cc: moo-cows.PARC@xerox.com
• In-Reply-to: "asb@media.mit.edu's message of \"Mon, 20 Nov 1995 18:16:11 PST\" <9511210216.AA18060@kilpikonna.media.mit.edu>ted A"

asb@media.mit.edu writes:
> If I were to make almost all the verbs on my MOO owned by #2 and do a
> set_task_perms, would I lose performance?  Would the scheduler be unhappy?
> How does the scheduler work anyway?  Is there any documentation?

It won't affect the scheduler at all, since you'll always have done the
set_task_perms() before doing any forks or suspends, and those are the only
things that affect ownership (and scheduling) of tasks.

There isn't any documentation of the scheduler.

	Pavel

• scheduler question
• From: asb@media.mit.edu

• Prev: scheduler question
• Next: Self-Cleaning Room
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows