Re: Why isn't BBQ in the core?

• Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 17:57:22 PST
• From:
  Edward Goff <egoff@iquest.com>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Length: 1063
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <19951030161748.3.KMP@BALBOA.Harlequin.COM>

I myself prefer object based.. Object based is good for getting work done 
but not worrying wether you need to have so and so reeycled cuase that 
last verb is gonna be 2k over you limit.. The best use of object is on an 
RPG style MOO I guess.

ARCHWIZ of horizion and Gadial


On Mon, 30 Oct 1995 kmp@harlequin.com wrote:

>     Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 20:00 EDT
>     From: Chris Jones <cjones@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>
> 
>     Would it be possible for anyone to tell me how exactly to change 
>     a MOO from Object-Based to Byte-Based Quota?
> 
> Not really a reply to Chris at all.  This just sparked me about the general
> policy question:
> 
> Is there someone keeping track of how many MOOs prefer object quota vs
> byte quota?  This seems like a no-brainer to me, but maybe I'm just
> confused.  Are the MOOs that are using object quota really doing so
> because they like it or because the switchover is more work/expertise than
> they are up to?
> 
> I just can't believe LambdaCore shouldn't have this change made in it
> before it goes out...
> 
> 

• Why isn't BBQ in the core?
• From: kmp@harlequin.com

• Prev: Re: Why isn't BBQ in the core?
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows