Word of Faith Member

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>I only included the Easton's quote because it was
excessible from work (where I made my previous post, as
well as this one).  

Do you have internet access at work?  If so, and for home
if not
check: http://www.khouse.org/blueletter which is WAY COOL
especially if you have a web site since you can put this
Bible search on your site (with your "logo" as the return
button) and
http://www.gospelcom.net/bible?language=English&version=KJV
which doesn't have the Strong's Concordance but is VERY
useful all the same.

>As a side note, I hope you realize that even Strong's has
it's weaknesses and is not exempt from having been
theologized.

I am indeed, (haven't you noticed how picky I am?)  but to
a nearly negligable degree and the real strength is that
even Trinitarians (the serious ones anyway) accept it.

> Strong's was put together by ONE MAN (James Strong).  I,
myself, am not fluent in the original Hebrew/Chaldee and
Greek of the Bible.  Unless I learn, or a group of Holy
Ghost filled scholars compile a respectable lexicon, I will
have to rely on what is available.  :(

I wonder why this hasn't been done.  Hey you Pentecostal
Press guys (or is that you brother?) what's up with that? 
Do these exist and I and my brother here are unenlightened?
 
Ball State, huh?  I was "wooed" by them upon graduation. 
Like it there?

Timothy Litteral
472 Grant St.
Marion Ohio 43302
trlitteral@usa.net
http://members.tripod.com/~trlitteral