Oneness Broadcasting Network

Dunemus@aol.com (Dunemus@aol.com)
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 22:36:37 EDT


In a message dated 9/24/98 1:12:57 PM EST, mshaw@teleplex.bsu.edu writes:

<< Would it be all that bad to have a Oneness Broadcasting Network?  Could we
 more effectively reach the lost whilst avoiding the pitfalls of other
 lucre-based networks like TBN?
 >>
Great minds really do think alike.  I was planning on writing an article to H-
F tonight,  entitled "Jesus Name Network"  Or Oneness Brodcasting Network."  I
personally feel that it's high time that the Apostolic church stake it's claim
over one of the most influential communication devices ever invented.  A
preached message that would normally only reach a few hundred,  could
literally reach millions across the face of the globe.  It could potentially
be the only opportunity that some would have to hear the true Apostolic
message.  
     Being a member of the PAW (where owning a tv is not a sin -only  what you
do with it),  we have no inhibition to placing our services on TV.  And it has
proven to be a very effective method.  Many souls are attracted to the lively
Pentecostal services that they see.  They come to the church and often get
saved.  This would be the ultimate goal of OBN or JNN - the saving of souls.  
     But tragically,  the true church of God has overwhelmingly decided to
allow satan to spread  his lying gospel through out the world via Trinity
Broadcasting Network..  And we have offered no counter punch.  As much time as
people spend with TV,  one would think that we'd wise up and realize that the
best place to catch peoples attention is while they are in front of the TV.
Where better to treat the people to an old fashioned message of "Repent ,  and
be ye converted,  when the times of refreshing comes from the presence of the
Lord."
The chief servant
Marlon