Pastors Leading the flock???)

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On 09/13/98 at 11:17 PM, "Timothy Litteral" <brotim@gte.net> said:

>Me:
>Call me crazy but that is in direct contradiction to the imfamous
>"obey" doctrine.  Hence my point that Y'all have to either admit that
>the verses were fudged or come up with some reason that they didn't put
>in a QUALIFICATION of when it is OK to NOT OBEY.  It would have to be
>here in this text to be valid, BTW.  Written anywhere else in the whole
>Bible would only introduce a direct CONTRADICTION.  I don't care
>(argumentatively speaking of course, I would like for you to see this
>;-) if you agree with what I say above or not, it is an INESCAPABLE
>logical FACT...


1) 17th century usage differs from modern usage
2) obey/rule would just as easily translate to heed the advice of.  As a
King gives weight to his avisors opinions.  His decision is final, but
the advisors give counsel.  If he choses to ingnore their counsel, the
results are his burden.

Skip

--  
----------------------------------------------------
personal:  http://user.icx.net/~grimel/MyPlace.html

I'm on a journey; "A Journey: Back to the Book of Acts".
Find out why http://user.icx.net/~grimel/back2acts.html

Why do we praise the way we do?
http://user.icx.net/~grimel/back2acts_why_we_praise.html

Best viewed at true colors

----------------------------------------------------