so, what, if anything, should be done about UPC spam?

"Robert J. Brown" (rj@ELI.WARIAT.ORG)
Thu, 17 Jul 1997 11:26:57 -0500


>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Masoner <richardm@cd.com> writes:

    Richard> Yo Bros...  I've been getting more and more spam^Wemail
    Richard> lately from Apostolics peddling their wares.

    Richard> On the one hand, I'd like to do business with my
    Richard> brethren, and I'm not sure I'd know anything about their
    Richard> services/products unless they email me.

    Richard> OTOH, I really am anti-spam for a number of reasons.  My
    Richard> email filter looks for some key words to get rid of some
    Richard> of the worst of it, plus I have a list of known spammers
    Richard> that my filter zots as the messages come in.  It still
    Richard> does nothing for the wasted bandwidth, though.  It's
    Richard> certainly piddly compared to accessing www.megavideo.com,
    Richard> but what about five years from now?

I think we should let them post *ONCE* to notify us that they have a
web site.  The post should be short -- just letting us know quickly
who they are, what the offer, and the URL or email address for more
info.  Maybe after 6 months they could post again.  And yes only
postings from Apostolics, and a required disclaimer that there is no
endorsement from any church or organization or this list.  Perhaps
they should also be required to have something in the Subject: header
line identifying the post anan ADVERTISEMENT.

-- 
--------  "And there came a writing to him from Elijah"  [2Ch 21:12]  --------
Robert Jay Brown III  rj@eli.wariat.org  http://eli.wariat.org  1 847 705-0424
Elijah Laboratories Inc.;  37 South Greenwood Avenue;  Palatine, IL 60067-6328
-----  M o d e l i n g   t h e   M e t h o d s   o f   t h e   M i n d  ------