Moderate Apostolics 2
"SHAW - MATTHEW" (mshaw@teleplex.bsu.edu)
Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:12:24 EST
Dear Bro. Starcher,
I have found this discussion enlightening, as we forge some
qualitative definitions for such terms as 'moderate.' I'm interested
in just what you mean by fellowship with those outside of the
Apostolic movement. You seem to indicate that conservatives are
often self-affirmed isolationists while moderates extend dialogue
outside of their own community of faith. However, I don't think that
we can say that conservatives are not interested in reaching beyond
the sometimes restrictive barriers that keep them cloistered.
I have often thought of Apostolics existing concentrically.
'Fundamentalist Apostolics' remain at the core of the movement
surrounded by more progressive Apostolics who may have greater
contact with the 'other.'
As Apostolics, and I'm simply being honest here, I think we have a
slanted view of dialogue and fellowship. Fellowship with those
outside of our movement is one-sided. For instance, we would gladly
send our choir, musicians or pastor to minister in a non-Apostolic
Church but would never reciprocate the invitation. I've played organ
at some denominational churches knowing full-well that they would not
even be invited to testify in my assembly. I don't mind telling you,
I feel a bit hypocritical about it. I am NOT saying that Apostolics
need to open their pulpits and choir lofts to those whom we consider
to be outside of the Truth, but can we say we're interested in
anything less than proselytisation otherwise.
I have been involved in what I consider productive dialogue on other
non-Apostolics lists. Each participant comes to the discussion with
his or her predisposition about what constitues doctrinal truth.
Of course, we generally leave those discussions with the same
persuasions and without the establishment of much common ground.
However, I think it is important that we realise that even though
non-Apostolics may reject our doctrinal stances, we can do a great
deal to improve our image and their perception of Apostolics if we
discuss our perspectives without an elitist attitude.
I think Apostolics, myself included, are somtimes guilty of believing
that Bible truth re-crystallised with Frank Ewart and that there is
nothing more that we can apprehend. I'm not saying that there are
extensive, doctrinal revelations to be had, but we should not operate
on the premise that we have a mononoply on this great Truth.
I'm rambling now, but please, Bro. Starcher, explain your idea of
fellowship outside of the Apostolic (conservative and moderate)
movement. Where do we draw lines? How do we respond to the
invitation of mutual fellowship?
All Honour to Christ Jesus.
Matthew Shaw