Proper English and good grammer (was:heart moving)
Bill Clifton (@nettaxi.com)
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:03:02 -0700
Robert J. Brown wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Harrell01" == Harrell01 <Harrell01@aol.com> writes:
>
> Harrell01> I know exactly where they are coming from, because I
> Harrell01> used to be there... prolly even more so than most
> Harrell01> people here.
>
> "prolly" ???
>
> Hypertext Webster Gateway Error
>
> No definition found for "prolly"
>
> SOUNDS LIKE:
>
> Main Entry: brol·ly
> Pronunciation: 'brä-lE
> Function: noun
> Inflected Form(s): plural brollies
> Etymology: by shortening & alteration
> Date: circa 1874
> chiefly British : UMBRELLA
>
> I take it that "prolly" is a similar kind of word derived "by
> shortening & alteration" from "probably". Lets please try to speak
> dictionary english, as perhaps determined by a spell checker, on this
> list, especially considering all the recent discussion about
> Apostolics and scholarship. :-)
>
ah man, ifins (if) we have ta (to) speak proper English and need good
grammer then I had best just start lurkin' (lurking) or unsubscribe as
the redneck in me is aweful evident. So I hope ya'll (you all) will
forgive me if I let some of my real time verbage slip into a post every
now and then. But if good grammer (and neither of my grammers was very
good :o( ) is required then I am worse of than a offactorally
challanged coon dog.
Lord Bless ya'll
Bro Bill ( I cant hep (help) it ifins (if) I I speak funny - least I
don't have an accent!) Clifton
PS: all this was said with my tongue in my check (makes the funny slang
even odder sound I s'pose!