Proper English and good grammer (was:heart moving)

Bill Clifton (@nettaxi.com)
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:03:02 -0700


Robert J. Brown wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Harrell01" == Harrell01  <Harrell01@aol.com> writes:
> 
>     Harrell01> I know exactly where they are coming from, because I
>     Harrell01> used to be there...  prolly even more so than most
>     Harrell01> people here.
> 
> "prolly" ???
> 
>     Hypertext Webster Gateway Error
> 
>     No definition found for "prolly"
> 
>     SOUNDS LIKE:
> 
>     Main Entry: brol·ly
>     Pronunciation: 'brä-lE
>     Function: noun
>     Inflected Form(s): plural brollies
>     Etymology: by shortening & alteration
>     Date: circa 1874
>     chiefly British : UMBRELLA
> 
> I take it that "prolly" is a similar kind of word derived "by
> shortening & alteration" from "probably".  Lets please try to speak
> dictionary english, as perhaps determined by a spell checker, on this
> list, especially considering all the recent discussion about
> Apostolics and scholarship.  :-)
> 

ah man, ifins (if) we have ta (to) speak proper English and need good
grammer then I had best just start lurkin' (lurking) or unsubscribe as
the redneck in me is aweful evident. So I hope ya'll (you all) will
forgive me if I let some of my real time verbage slip into a post every
now and then. But if good grammer (and neither of my grammers was very
good :o(  ) is required then I am worse of than a offactorally
challanged coon dog.


Lord Bless ya'll
Bro Bill ( I cant hep (help) it ifins (if) I I speak funny - least I
don't have an accent!) Clifton

PS: all this was said with my tongue in my check (makes the funny slang
even odder sound I s'pose!