1.1.14-Apr02

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Gert Doering wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 10:06:34AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> > Why not putting the releases each in its directory, such as
> > 
> >   1.1.21
> 
> Would this cut the name length?  I'm not really willing to change the file
> names - especially with the PGP signatures, unique file names are important.

To my knowledge, the only problem with those ``long'' (ie normal) names is
that you can't easily sport which one is 1.1.21 (apart from the date, or
typing = in UNIX/Lynx).

So, keeping the SAME file names, but putting them in a directory per
release with a name visible (such as 1.1.21), could solve this cosmetic
problem without needing to name the files in a MS-* beurk fashion.