Anrufbeantworter mit Hagenuk Speed Dragon?

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hi,

David Kastrup wrote:
>    Well, maybe not the latter, but definitely the former.  There is no CAPI
>    support in vgetty.  Adding one would require writing a low-level driver
>    for the Speed Dragon which provides the interal vgetty API on top of
>    this "AT-command-CAPI". 
> 
> Uhm, I guess you misunderstood.  The Speed Dragon *either* provides
> the basic functionality via AT-mode commands, *or* a complete
> implementation of CAPI-2.0 via the serial line.  As I am not aware of
> any efforts under Linux to work with CAPI, I was asking about how to
> work with the AT-command options.  

Well, if it doesn't *have* AT commands for voice, you *have* to use CAPI,
if you like it or not.

How do you propose to do voice if the Speed Dragon doesn't have AT
commands and you do not want to do CAPI?

> I have already looked at the vgetty
> code and have gathered the impression that the internal vgetty API
> *requires* a basic AT+ voice command support, and only the more
> specific details of individual modems get encapsulated into the
> various modem specific files.

AFAIK, no.  You have to have something that follows the general
programming model of a voice modem, but I think that it should be possible
to write a low level driver that works on top of some kind of CAPI
interface.  Marc?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de