USR X2 & Windoze faxing

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

--IMA.Boundary.200309168
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

  Yes, x2 only works when one side (the server side) is digital. This 
  provides 56K (or whatever speed is reachable) from the server to the 
  client modem. The link from the client to the server is (pretty much) 
  bog standard V.34.
  
  The bit about only having one local loop is a bit of a misconception. 
  The more A/D D/A conversions you have, the more of the signal you 
  lose. So, you *can* connect at x2 speeds through extra local loops 
  (for example, speaking from personal experience, through rather grotty 
  hotel pbxen), you just get lower connect speeds, in the order of 
  33-35K.
  
  My personal opinion on Windoze comms software is unprintable. I have 
  yet to use any Windoze comms software that didn't crash, fall over, or 
  otherwise exhibit some form of bug within half an hour. Maybe I'm just 
  unlucky, but from what I hear, I think it's more like Microsoft can't 
  code for toffee.
  
  Cheers, Steve


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: USR X2 & Windoze faxing
Author: "M.W. Ingenthron" <ingenthr@nevada.edu> at Internet
Date: 24/4/97 8:55 AM


> Well, it's out in the States, and doing OK over there. I'm working on 
> the UK side, it'll be out RSN. Speeds are looking like average 
> connects of 45-48K, something of that order.
  
I believe the case is that X2 only works when half of your 
connect is digital. There can only be one local loop invlovled. The 
idea is that your ISP buys fancy x2 receiving equipment and hooks it up 
digitally, while you plug in your modem to an old POTS line.
  
Personally, I'd like to see the industry in the US switch over to ISDN, 
but every year, it seems less and less like that will happen. I 
understand it's doing OK in Europe though...
  
> Out of curiosity, how come folks running MS Doze seem to have little 
> problem with faxing. I'm sure the modems in the boxes they are buying 
> are nothing special. Admittedly, my sample size is quite small.
  
This is the second time I've seen this in the last week. I've worked 
with several modems under windows and I'm convinced that none of them 
work properly. 
  
The first one was a Zoltrix with a UMC chipset. Very cheap. Amazingly, 
this one worked the best. It did have problems with not stopping 
recording, but faxing generally worked well.
  
The second was a USR Sportster 33.6 voice. I only once connected at 
anything higher than 26.4, and that was when I plugged the modem directly 
into another modem. I must say that data worked great. Faxing and voice 
were horrible. The modem would consistantly hang while trying to record 
enough voice to set it up. I eventually gave up. It too had problems 
recording forever.
  
Both packages came with 16 bit software intended for Windows 3.1-- I 
don't think USR has anything newer yet.
  
The system that worked best was a little program ($70) called PMFax under 
os/2. With the USR, it worked really well. Never had a problem-- and 
had the ability to configure it however I wanted using REXX scripting.
  
The other two were rockwell chipsets on sound/modem combo cards. They 
also came with win 3.1 based software. Need I say more?
  
      Matt Ingenthron
  
  
 _________________________________________________________________________ 
 \ ingenthr@nevada.edu ingenthr@cs.unlv.edu ingenthr@nye.nscee.edu / 
 \  ingenthr@aurora.nscee.edu ingenthr@clark.nscee.edu  / 
 \    http://www.nevada.edu/home/0/ingenthr/   / 
 \ Voice: (702) 458-5118     Fax: (702) 458-4062 / 
 \  Snail: 3524 Middlebury Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89121   / 
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  
  
  
--IMA.Boundary.200309168
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="RFC822 message headers"

Received: from usr.com (mail.usr.com) by robogate2.usr.com with SMTP
 (IMA Internet Exchange 2.02 Enterprise) id 35F869C0; Thu, 24 Apr 97 11:13:16
-0500
Received: from ns.crynwr.com by usr.com (8.7.5/3.1.090690-US Robotics)
	id KAA25295; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 10:55:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 1922 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 1997 15:59:09 -0000
Delivered-To: mgetty@crynwr.com
Received: (qmail 1915 invoked from network); 24 Apr 1997 15:59:08 -0000
Received: from pioneer.nevada.edu (ingenthr@131.216.1.95)
 by ns.crynwr.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 1997 15:59:07 -0000
Received: (ingenthr@localhost) by pioneer.nevada.edu (8.8.5/8.6.4) id IAA07251;
Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "M.W. Ingenthron" <ingenthr@nevada.edu>
To: mgetty@crynwr.com
Subject: USR X2 & Windoze faxing
In-Reply-To: <35F682F0.3000@usr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970424083636.20355A-100000@pioneer.nevada.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
ReSent-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
ReSent-From: "M.W. Ingenthron" <ingenthr@nevada.edu>
ReSent-To: mgetty@crynwr.com
ReSent-Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970424085848.20355B@pioneer.nevada.edu>
X-email-warning: As a cautionary note, there have been recent instances of
	people forging mail addresses. If you have any reason to believe
	this message is not authentic, please contact the listed sender or
	System Computing Services at (702) 895-4585.

--IMA.Boundary.200309168--
.