faxspool(1) / faxqueue(5): please comment
Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Sun, 6 Mar 1994 15:34:16 +0100
Hi,
Uwe Fuerst wrote:
> > faxspool(1) mgetty+sendfax manual faxspool(1)
> > ....
> >
> > If "phone-number" contains non-numeric characters,
> > faxspool interprets it as an alias and tries to look it up
> > in /usr/local/lib/mgetty+sendfax/aliases and $HOME/.faxnrs
> > . These files have a very simple format: one line per
> > alias, alias name first, blank, phone number.
> ^^^^^
> Just an idea: could you extend this to accept <TAB> (or preferable
> two or more TABs) as well? This would make the files
> a little more readable
Basically I thought of changing the format to
alias:phone:verbose_to
^^^^^^^^^^ as if specified with "-D <verbose_to>".
- but you're right, TABs have their advantages. Should be easy, though.
I'm just not sure what to do with the "verbose_to" extention - what about
alias<whitespace>phone<whitespace>verbose_to
- easy, except the fact that "verbose_to" may contain whitespace itself
("uwe<tab>099013692<tab>Uwe S. Fuerst").
> > Access control is handled similar to the way "crontab"
> > does it:
[..]
> What happens if both files are there?
In faxspool, fax.allow has precedence, and that's how I understood the
crontab manpage.
Does anybody know how crontab does it?
> > -M <file name>
> > Multicasting - read a list of telephone numbers to
> > send the fax to from the given file. Do not use in
> > conjunction with "-m".
>
> What format does this file have? Each number in a single line?
I thought of
phone/alias[<whitespace>verbose_to]
- comments anybody? (Nevertheless, it's not implemented yet).
> > FILES
> > /usr/local/lib/mgetty+sendfax/aliases
[..]
> Well, I'm not very happy with this path values, but I can live
[..]
> time, you could add some "sed ..." lines to the Makefile, changing
> these path values to the configuration settings...
OK, TODO list, number 87.
> > faxspool cannot do time scheduling
>
> Is this on your TODO list? If so, you should think of leaving
> it out of the "usage" message one gets when invoking "faxspool"
> w/o any parameters, 'till it's implemented
$ faxspool
faxspool: phone number missing
Usage: faxspool [-p] [-f mailaddr] [-u user] [-q] [-D dest] phone file ...
[FAXQUEUE.5]
> > pages <file(s)>
[..]
> > the user that runs faxrunq(1). Required.
>
> Required? We don't have such a file when we spooled a "fax polling"
> job, do we?
True. Faxrunq even handles it (more or less accidentally ;-) ). Changed
that.
> > PROCESSING
> > While a given JOB file is processed by faxrunq(1), it's
> > locked against sending it multiple times by temorarily
> > renaming it to JOB.locked, thus it may happen that a
> > faxq(1) command doesn't show this job.
>
> What 'bout adding some lines of code to faxq(1) to show this "locked"
> jobs as "currently beeing send" or something like this :-)
Lemme first add code to faxrunq(1) to actually lock it... it's promised,
but I did not yet get around to actually doing it (answering mail all day
;-) ), then I can try to think of a way to avoid having to triple-check
for the JOB file (it may have been moved from JOB.locked to JOB or vice
versa between "ls" ing all the job files and opening them!).
> > When a job is successfully sent, it's not deleted but the
> > JOB file is renamed to JOB.done. Because of this, you can
> > still see old jobs with "faxq -o". You should regularily
> > clean up the outgoing fax directory, removing old faxes.
>
> One could do this by a cronjob, similar to the "cleantmp" facility,
> like
> find <faxspooldir> -atime +<days> -exec rm -f {} \;
That's what I'm doing right now, but I'm thinking of a "faxcleand" daemon,
that will also notify the fax admin if it finds stale "JOB" files ('cause
faxrunq isn't running), and handle stale JOB.locked files (because faxrunq
crashed for whatever reason).
> (look at "/usr/lib/cleantmp" on SCO systems to get an idea of what
> I mean)
Yeah...
> > When a job cannot be sent in five tries, the JOB file is
> > renamed to JOB.suspended. To re-queue this job, rename
> > the JOB file back and remove all the "Status" lines in it.
>
> This could be done by a yet to be written script faxreq(1) :-)
I include the code line to do it in the mail - so you can just cut'n paste
the command to another window and execute it there... ;-)
gert
--
Ok, Ihr habt gewonnen, hier ist eine neue signature...
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-3243328 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de