Re: trouble comiling on NeXT

• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 11:55:03 PST
• From:
  Matthew Wojcik <woj@k2.ccs.neu.edu>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Dec 95 09:37:17 PST." <95Dec22.103717pdt.7593@silk.parc.xerox.com>

>
>The problem is that the NeXT folks provide certain POSIX functions
>(sigemptyset, sigaddset, and sigprocmask) but don't declare the type of their
>arguments (sigset_t) in the right header file <signal.h>. If someone will tell
>me where they *do* declare that type (*if* they do), I'll try to add a case to
>the configuration script to work around NeXT's bug.
>
>	Pavel
>

[ramoth:/usr/etc]
> hostinfo
Mach kernel version:
         NeXT Mach 3.2: Mon Oct 18 21:57:41 PDT 1993;
root(rcbuilder):mk-149.30.15.obj~2/RC_m68k/RELEASE_M68K

Here's a snipping from /usr/include/bsd/sys/signal.h:

> #ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE            /* Additional entries required by */
>                                 /* POSIX                          */
> 
>         #include <sys/types.h>  /* for pid_t */
> 
>         typedef int sigset_t; 



--Woj                        Matthew Wojcik                   woj@ccs.neu.edu
                        Experimental Systems Group       woj@mbunix.mitre.org
           College of Computer Science, Northeastern University
                     http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/woj/                  

• Re: trouble comiling on NeXT
• From: Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>

• Re: trouble comiling on NeXT
• From: Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>

• Prev: Re: trouble comiling on NeXT
• Next: Re: trouble comiling on NeXT
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows