Re: Suggestion, re: Minimal.db

• Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:29:00 PST
• From:
  Bill Garrett <bill@yeehaw.com>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <v02130500ace4907b91a9@[204.50.80.124]>

> are still essential. I was thinking of generalizing the use of $local and a
> & prefix. The idea would be that every programmer could @local-corify
> mygeneric as myfoobar. You would then have   &myfoobar == $local.myfoobar
> == mygeneric. The trick is to change set_verb_code so and eval so that they
> do the &myfoobar -> $local.myfoobar conversion and to have verb_code do the
> $local.myfoobar -> &myfoobar conversion.
> Any regexp wiz interested?

$local is very often the dumping ground for such objects; there's just no 
commonly-accepted standard for this practice, though.  Short of telling 
everyone to port from one single MOO, it will come down to object numbers 
in the end I think.  Yr right, it is a standards problem.

> You port as wiz, ok, but does all the code you port with @autoport is
> wizzed-on-arrival? or only the wizzed if it was wiz owned at the from_site

Autoport includes an option called `owner'.  For example:
  @autoport Lambda.xerox.com 8888 Janus fat-chance #1234 owner=$hacker

By default, anything you port is owned by you.  The owner option lets you 
set the owner of what you're porting to something else.

• Re: Suggestion, re: Minimal.db
• From: rgodard@divsun.unige.ch (Richard Godard)

• Prev: Re: Suggestion, re: Minimal.db
• Next: Re: Suggestion, re: Minimal.db
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows