Re: Minimal.DB

• Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:56:08 PST
• From:
  Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>
• cc: MOO-Cows.PARC@xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-to: <199511142216.RAA10704@arkady.hygnet.com>

On Tue, 14 Nov 1995, Seth I. Rich wrote:

> So I was once again hacking minimal.db, and I notice that I'm always
> starting with the same steps.  Why doesn't minimal.db consist of a single
> object, #0, which is a player and a programmer and a wizard, with a
> :do_login_command verb which returns #0?  I don't see any reason for
> minimal.db to contain a room or root parents at all.

I agree.. I immediately recycled everything and started coding AS #0.  In 
the MOO now, #1-owned verbs are wizpermed, and #0-owned verbs aren't.  
Like a $hacker.  I suggest setting up an easy login and $room so other 
wizzes may log in and communicate easily. (for those doing a social-type moo)

- Kipp

• Re: Minimal.DB
• From: Ian Macintosh <ian@iman.internet.co.nz>

• Minimal.DB
• From: "Seth I. Rich" <sir@po.cwru.edu>

• Prev: Re: Minimal.DB
• Next: Re: Minimal.DB
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows