Re: Threatening of Gothic MOO

• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 21:11:10 PST
• From:
  The Ferretously Funky One <finder@wna-linknet.com>
• cc: MOO-Cows.PARC@xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-to: <1.5.4.32.19961029042009.006a6f78@mailbox.syr.edu>

On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Kipp the Kidd wrote:

> Now, if sending an informative or complaint (at most)
> message to moo-cows is the worst the archwiz did, I think we should have the
> decency to not complain.  I realize the sender's writing and conflict
> resolution skills were not great, but he/she did almost exactly what I would
> have done.  Looked to a higher authority for help...  That is what we are
> here for, are we not?
> 
> - Kipp

Ok, fine. I guess I misunderstood the purpose for this list's existence. 
My fault. I'll stick to posting to my ferret listserve and leave the 
MOO-Cows list to the "higher authorities" who find a redeeming quality in 
the garbage that was the original post.

My bad.

-Melissa A. Durfee

• Re: Threatening of Gothic MOO
• From: Some Dude <bastian@net2.netacc.net>

• Re: Threatening of Gothic MOO
• From: Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>

• Prev: Re: Threatening of Gothic MOO
• Next: Re: Threatening of Gothic MOO
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows