Re: verb protection

• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:28:12 PDT
• From:
  Richard Godard <janus@cam.org>
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95L.961003081302.5987A-100000@unixs5.cis.pitt.edu>
• References: <18510639@prancer.Dartmouth.EDU>

At 7:14 -0500 10/3/96, James R O'Kane wrote:
>On 3 Oct 1996, Jefferson M. Dubrule wrote:
>
>> --- "James R O'Kane" wrote:
>> > both involve adding props similar to the $server_options.protect_foo where
>> > it's .protect_verbname.
>>
>> Why not add a flag to each verb?
>>
>
>this an in-db way of doing it for those who don't want to hack the kernel.

I've done it in-db, no server hacks. Require 1.8.0x though (for a clean
implementation)

Check $blocked_verbs at Tecfa <http://tecfamoo.unige.ch:7777> or
$blocked_methods at E_MOO <http://tecfasun1.unige.ch 4243>
The code might be accessible through some object/code browsers... I'm not
sure... I guess I should put the code and documentation on a web page...


But if you just want wizard to make all verbs with the same name on all
objects non-overridable, you might want to implement something with a
global property (like $protected_verbs_name) I would suggest you being very
cautious about the wildcards tho.

Good luck.

-- Richard

• Re: verb protection
• From: Jefferson.M.Dubrule@dartmouth.edu (Jefferson M. Dubrule)
• Re: verb protection
• From: "James R O'Kane" <jrost10+@pitt.edu>

• Prev: Re: verb protection
• Next: Re: verb protection
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows