Re: [TALK] Was: Re: REQUEST: #3:exits code

• Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 08:41:53 PDT
• From:
  sir@po.cwru.edu (Seth I. Rich)
• Reply-to:
  sir@po.cwru.edu (Seth I. Rich)
• cc: belfry@zeta.org.au, bmgustav@bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il

> Gustavo... this flame should of been sent to me only...
> ...personally, I would assume it to be inappropriate for the MOO-cows
> mailing list...

Sir, if you realize that your .signature is inappropriate, do please
change it.  Personally, I think it's abysmal `netiquette' and shows a
lack of respect to one's mail recipients when sending a signature which
itself fills a screen.  There was once a time when a signature greater
than four lines long would result in its sender receiving oodles of
correction notes; I'd love it if the 'Net didn't deteriorate entirely.

Seth / Blackbriar

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seth I. Rich
Woo, woo!  OpalMOO's back!       There is nothing more precious than
Rabbits on walls, no problem.    a tear of true repentance.

• Prev: Re: [TALK] Was: Re: REQUEST: #3:exits code
• Next: [WWW-ANNOUNCEMENT] My MOO page is now in English
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows