Re: compiling on NEXTSTEP 3.3

• Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 16:48:37 PDT
• From:
  Christian Gruber <cgruber@virtualcity.com>
• Reply-To:
  cgruber@virtualcity.com
• CC: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
• Organization: Quintessence Software Foundry
• References: <199608020720.DAA27005@darwin.evolution.com>

Gita Enders wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hey all, I got a response to my query, and thought the moo-cows
> > should know for any NeXT-based MOOing.
> 
> Hey, thanks. I was going to ask you to do that. We're trying to get
> off Solaris and go NeXT all the way, but I wasn't even going to
> *think* about trying this alone.
> 
> G.
Hmm.  Well, I've got a working NeXTSTEP 3.3 binary for intel
architecture if anyone is interested.  We should be recieving
OpenStep 4.0 developer next week, and when that's in I'll re-compile
and make those public.  If people give me a few days, I'll package it
up for NeXTs and make it public.  Any support for the notion?

Christian.

• Re: compiling on NEXTSTEP 3.3
• From: Gita Enders <genders@evolution.com>

• Prev: Re: compiling on NEXTSTEP 3.3
• Next: copyright for LambdaCore
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows