reraise and other error-handling

• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 16:11:00 PDT
• From:
  "Adams, Charles" <cadams@msgate.litc.lockheed.com>
• Encoding: 10 TEXT

I'd definitely go for a reraise statement too.  It'd probably have to be a 
statement, since only statements are checked to see if they're in the proper 
scope (i.e.  continue" can only be called inside a loop), and a reraise 
would only make sense in a try..except..endtry.

I also noticed that a try..except..finally..endtry construct does not 
compile.  It seems you can't mix the two kinds -- a "finally" statement 
can't be seen in a construct when "except" statements are also present.  Was 
this omission accidental or deliberate?

• Prev: Reference to (Lambda)MOO on the 'FAQ'...
• Next: Re: reraise and other error-handling
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows