Re: raise()

• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 14:24:32 PDT
• From:
  slayer@kaiwan.com
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 03:09 PM 8/2/96 PDT, Richard Godard wrote:
>One problem that I experience those days is catching errors, analyse the
>value/message and raise() it again if I can't do anything with the value...
>it works nicely, except the traceback that result is not as informative :(
>
>I was wondering if we could have a reraise() bf (or reraise; statement)
>that would continue the raising (and error catching) process as if the
>except clause containing the bf call/statement has not caight it?
>

why not just format the traceback and send it off to the player, or modify
$handle_uncaught_error to accept that info if you have it do something else
with it?

• Prev: raise()
• Next: Re: raise()
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows