Re: Parser Problem

• Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:29:50 PDT
• From:
  tom@mvision.com (Tom Ritchford)
• Reply-To:
  tom@mvision.com
• In-Reply-To: <v01530500ac6a762f32e4@[204.77.74.201]> (mpauker@peganet.com)

>At 11:45 AM 8/30/95, Coolin MacKaarmick wrote:
>>On Wed, 30 Aug 1995, Tom Ritchford wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>As I suspected.  The crux of my question is whether there is a workaround
>>or if there is an inherent proscription on constructs such as "@pay bob
>>$10."  I doubt it (a workaround), but maybe someone's been very, very
>>clever.
>>
>>Ideas?
>>
>>Colin
>>
>
>You could define the verb with the arguments: any any none, and instead of
>checking iobjstr, check prepstr, which ought to be your "$10", in your
>example.

Come on... don't you try things on the MOO before posting?
The only possible prepositions are:

     with/using
     at/to
     in front of
     in/inside/into
     on top of/on/onto/upon
     out of/from inside/from
     over
     through
     under/underneath/beneath
     behind
     beside
     for/about
     is
     as
     off/off of

READ THE PROGRAMMER'S MANUAL ON COMMAND PARSING!

    /t

• Re: Parser Problem
• From: mpauker@peganet.com (Matt Pauker)

• Prev: Re: Parser Problem
• Next: Re: Parser Problem
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows