Re: MOO into C

• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 12:48:31 PDT
• From:
  Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>
• Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• In-reply-to: dg@dcs.st-and.ac.uk's message of "Wed, 24 Jul 1996 09:40:21 PDT" <5669.9607241640@dufftown.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk>

dg@dcs.st-and.ac.uk writes:
> 1 + 1 + 1 compiles to:
> 
> 	NUM 1
> 	NUM 1
> 	NUM 1
> 	ADD
> 	ADD
> 
> and 1 + (1 + 1) compiles to
> 
> 	NUM 1
> 	NUM 1
> 	ADD
> 	NUM 1
> 	ADD
> 
> without using opcode tricks, and the decompiler manages to preserve brackets.

Actually, I think you've got these two code snippets swapped; the first
expression compiles to the second opcode sequence and vice-versa.

	Pavel

• Re: MOO into C
• From: dg@dcs.st-and.ac.uk

• Re: MOO into C
• From: dg@dcs.st-and.ac.uk

• Prev: Re: MOO into C
• Next: Re: MOO into C
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows