re: flying things

• Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 07:16:33 PDT
• From:
  Benjamin Loomis <ben@monkey.sbay.org>
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <96May22.060250pdt.230924@mu.parc.xerox.com>

> ------------------------------
> 
> From: Zachary DeAquila <zachary@zachs.place.org>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 22:24:07 -0700
> Subject: flying things
> 
> - ------- Forwarded Message
> 
-snip-
> >
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 05:32:22 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: A good set of generic questions...
> >> 
> >> At 01:36 PM 5/20/96 -0400, you wrote:
> >> >I guess my point is, Matt; MOOs don't *need* grphics.  Perhaps another 
> >> >form, like other VRMLs, but MOO doesn't need to be tarted up with 
> >> >graphics and sounds.  
> >> >
> >> >You can put wings on a car, set on the runway, drive it real fast, but 
> >> >you can't make it fly.
> >> >
> >> >Regards,
> >> >jkw
> >> >Lumper
> >> >
> >Good Analogy.
> >
> 
> I'm reminded of the old engineer's saying 'Anything will fly with 
> enough thrust behind it.'  Witness MS Windows.  
> 
>  --Zachary
> 
> (Zachary@Lambda, JHM, Media, etc)
True, but I dont think that windoze is flying...

|--------------------------------|
|Benjamin Loomis (aka Blue Blob) |-|  |---------------------|
|http://www.monkey.sbay.org/~ben/  |--| ben@monkey.sbay.org |
|"If all systems are bad, how then you tell it is bad, |--- |
|if you have nothing to compare it to?" |--------------|
|---------------------------------------|

• Prev: Re: flying things
• Next: Re: flying things
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows