Re: Not understanding eval traceback (Seconded)

• Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 08:52:27 PDT
• From:
  slayer@kaiwan.com
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 08:40 AM 5/11/96 PDT, Saint Erroneous wrote:
>On Sat, 11 May 1996, Geoffrey King wrote:
>
>> In case your dubious, here is the entire train of events:
>> Entered the following:
>>   @verb me:r6 this none this
>>   @edit me:r6
>>   "return 6;
>>   compile
>>   quit
>>   eval caller:r6()
>> 
>> Got back:
>>   wizard>> eval caller:r6()
>>   #-1:Input to EVAL, line 1:  Verb not found
>>   ... called from built-in function eval()
>>   ... called from #57:eval_cmd_string (this == #2), line 18
>>   ... called from #57:eval*-d (this == #2), line 10
>>   (End of traceback)
>
>You forgot to set the verb to be +x, so eval won't be able to find it.
>
>@chmod me:r6 +x
>
>should do the trick.
>
>-michael
>
hm I thought when you made a verb 'this none this' and didn't specify the
permissions it made it 'rxd' by default?

>
>


...This is not a signature.

• Re: Not understanding eval traceback (Seconded)
• From: Saint Erroneous <mpv@st-andrews.ac.uk>

• Prev: Re: Not understanding eval traceback (Seconded)
• Next: Re: Not understanding eval traceback (Seconded)
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows