Re: Proposed change to the MOO-Cows mailing list

• Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 14:20:00 PDT
• From:
  abakun@rci.ripco.com (ThwartedEfforts)
• Content-Length: 1368
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

>An idea, have:
>
>    List                 Status
>    ----                 ------
>    MOO-Cows-Discussion  Restricted  ("MOO-Cows" would be the same)
>    MOO-Cows-QnA         Open
>
>The discussion list would be restricted in that it would have two states to
>registration, one would be listening (anybody can listen), and one would
>be sending status.  Simply have it be that you must exist on the list for
>at least ~2 months (?) before you can send to the list...  This could be
>too confusing though.  You could also moderate the QnA, but I think it would
>be better to have a mondo filter on the list, and on certain keywords it
>would send back the FAQ...(I know Majordomo will do this)

I (very sarcasticly) suggested a list split a while ago.  Wasn't well
received. (wonder why... mmmh :) ).  A list split could be perceived as
elitist... while I'm not against elitist practices, others probably are. Ack!

>(BTW, what is it called when a bunch of cows moo at each other in a field?)

MOOs! See'em?
 (okay, that's reallllly bad. sorry)
  ______                              __
    /   /                 _/_      / /  `  /)  /)       _/_
 --/   /_  , , , __.  __  /  _  __/ /--   //  //  __,_  /  _
(_/   / /_(_(_/_(_/|_/ (_<__</_(_/ (___, //__//__(_) (_<__/_)_
http://www.interaccess.com/users/abakun />  />
                                       </  </

• Prev: Re: Proposed change to the MOO-Cows mailing list
• Next: Re: Proposed change to the MOO-Cows mailing list (fwd)
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows