MOO-cows Mailing List Archive

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

re:hash & balanced trees

Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:13:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:
Charles Victor Bancroft <bancroft@america.net>
cc: moo-cows@the-b.org
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <v03102800afde334441f5@[205.151.119.249]>


> That's fine for mutable data type... but unless I'm mistaken MOO lists 
> are not.
Not sure that one would want to replace the moo list data type with a hash
or tree.  Rather, by adding new builtin support for alternative types, it 
gives programmers a choice.

Why not add both a $hash and a $tree =8?

l8r,
v

Follow-Ups:

Re: hash & balanced trees

From: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>

Re: hash & balanced trees

From: Jay Carlson <nop@nop.com>

References:

re:hash & balanced trees

From: Richard Godard <janus@cam.org>

Prev by Subject: re:hash & balanced trees
Next by Subject: Re: hash & balanced trees
Prev by thread: re:hash & balanced trees
Next by thread: Re: hash & balanced trees
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index