Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()

• Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 22:33:01 PDT
• From:
  Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>
• Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 09:59 PM 4/27/96 PDT, slayer@kaiwan.com wrote:
>>So?   If this happens, it obviously means something was programmed
>>incorrectly and should raise an E_MAXREC.  What else could it do?

I can't believe nobody here pointed this out...  From the changelog, IF THE
VERB CONTAINING THE BUILTIN IS NOT ON #0, then $bf_FOO is called...  Thus,
if it IS on #0, then $bf_FOO ISN'T called...  there's nothing recursive
about this.

- Kipp
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS/CC d- s+:- a16 C++ UL++++ P+ L++ E-? W+ !N--@ !o-- K->K++++++
w++(--) O- M-- V--? PS++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP-? t+ 5(+) X++ R+++(*)
!tv b+ DI++++ D++++ G e* h!()(*) r+ !y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK-----
MOO projects:
  MOO Core project:          paradigm.microwave.com 5000
  MOO2000:                   moo.microwave.com 2000
  MundoHispano:              europa.syr.edu 8888
------END NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK------

• Re: call_function() and bf_FOO()
• From: Richard Godard <rgodard@divsun.unige.ch>

• Prev: Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()
• Next: Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows