Re: 1.8p2 weirdness...

• Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 09:57:22 PST
• From:
  Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>
• Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• In-reply-to: asb@media.mit.edu's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:56:23 PST" <9603221556.AA27155@kilpikonna.media.mit.edu>

asb@media.mit.edu writes:
> This is another example of the same sort of problem that keeps coming up--one
> task using too much memory.  Is it a good idea and would it be feasible to
> implement a per-task memory limit?  (Possibly wiz-overrideable.)

This is enormously difficult to implement in the current server in anything
even approaching an efficient way.  It certainly won't happen on my watch and
my guess is that it won't happen soon under any maintainer.

	Pavel

• Re: 1.8p2 weirdness...
• From: asb@media.mit.edu

• Prev: Re: 1.8p2 weirdness...
• Next: Re: 180 scattering
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows