Re: My problem with #90:moveto acceptable

• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 12:33:10 PST
• From:
  slayer@kaiwan.com
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 11:42 AM 3/21/96 PST, John P. Wilson wrote:
>
>I was trying to create new objects with 1.8.0p2 and the latest LambdaCore 
>and was getting this:
>
>@create $note called test
>#90:moveto acceptable (this == #2), line 15:  Invalid indirection
>... called from #1:accept (this == #2), line 2
>... called from built-in function move()
>... called from #4:@create (this == #2), line 41
>(End of traceback)
>
>
>So I looked and moveto is defined on #56, I eliminated #90:"moveto 
>acceptable" by:
>
>@copy #90:moveto to #90:oldmoveto
>@rmverb #90:moveto
>
>
>Any negative comments or holes?  I have not found any, yet...
>But they will probably show up...
>
>John
>
#56 I think is $wiz right? So wizards will be unmoveable, but players can be
moved since #90 (which is Frand's player class) has a moveto that lets
players @refuse move.

• Re: My problem with #90:moveto acceptable
• From: Christopher Unkel <cunkel@us.itd.umich.edu>

• Prev: My problem with #90:moveto acceptable
• Next: Re: My problem with #90:moveto acceptable
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows