RE: Problem w/1.8.0, beta 3 (fwd)

• Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 20:34:38 PST
• From:
  Ron Stanions <chaeon@roc.clawpaw.com>
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I rewrote the verb above it not to pass() but to handle what pass()ing 
would have done instead.  I don't remember the particular function that
bit me but it was actually using @mail and upon typing send that I got my
tracebacks.

----------
From:  Philippe Mesritz[SMTP:pam4@lehigh.edu]
Sent:  Friday, March 08, 1996 11:26 PM
To:  Ron Stanions
Subject:  RE: Problem w/1.8.0, beta 3 (fwd)

>I ran into a few problems like this, particularly around the editor, but =
>mine centered around the #49:ok function.  It was because of the new =
>inclusion of builtin functions into the callers() list.  some things in =
>the @editor functions look to see if the current verb was called from a =
>specific position within the caller() stack, which gets messed up when =
>pass() is included into the callers() list.=20

    How'd you fix the callers() list problem?

    -Philippe

*******************************************************************************
** Philippe Mesritz ** http://www.lehigh.edu/~pam4/pam4.html ** AD&D, MOOs,  **
*************************************************************** MUSHes, RP.  **
** I have found a person that has captured my heart again.   ** Check out    **
** She a very wonderfull young lady and, though,she lives    ** the homepage **
** quite a ways away, it matters not.  She cares for me and  ** for info!!!  **
** I care for her.  I'm glad that I found someone to restore ******************
** my faith in love and trust.  Her name is Lesley Slade.    ******************
*******************************************************************************

• Prev: RE: Problem w/1.8.0, beta 3 (fwd)
• Next: RE: Problem w/1.8.0, beta 3 (fwd)
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows