Re: Amiguous Matches

• Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 10:20:08 PST
• From:
  Edward Goff <egoff@iquest.com>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <199603030833.CAA09239@alice.adsnet.com>

Now this would be great I've seen it used on an LPMOO before and its very 
helpful... that and it cuts down on alot of the "I don't know which 
<blank> you mean.. so if you get it fixed let me know please I'm dong and 
RPG MOO and its gettingto be a pain wen I have several items of the same 
name in the same room...

egoff@vespucci.iquest.com


On Sun, 3 Mar 1996, Matthew Hapke wrote:

>   I am running a MOO in which a player may wind up in a room with several
> objects with the same name, (ie a room full of swords or whatever)
> 
>  I wanted to switch around do_huh, so that if an ambiguous match occurs, the
> player can select the item from a list, or at the very least, will be
> returned to the first item on the list.
> Unfortunately, it appears that the parser already decides that it doesn't
> know which verb you mean before it ever hits do_huh. Am I reading this
> right? Is there any way to solve this dilemma?  I was using the standard
> Lambda core, with the get verb on thing in my testing of this code.
> 
> 
> 

• Amiguous Matches
• From: Matthew Hapke <mahapke@adsnet.com>

• Prev: Re: Amiguous Matches
• Next: Re: Amiguous Matches
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows