MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The future of MOO
-
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:05:49 PST
-
From: Jan Rune Holmevik <jan.holmevik@hedb.uib.no>
-
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
The question about the future of MOO and whether this technology is now
dead, is one that has surfaced here on this list many times over the past
three years that I have subscribed. Personally I feel that MOO is still a
viable technology and will continue to be so for many years to come, IF
people believe in it and continue to make it better. There are many
reasons that support this claim. In academia, which is the sector I know
best, MOOs have gained recognition on a scale that no other MU*
technology has. The reason for this is that people associated with MOOs
like MediaMOO, Diversity University and numerous others (see the
GNA-Network) have championed the cause of bringing MOO in from the cold
(no pun intended). Over the past three years I have seen a growing number
of conference presentations, research papers and publications dealing
with various aspects of MOO and it's use. All this groundwork now finally
seems to pay off because administrators and others with money are finally
starting to see the benefits of MOO. When we have gotten this far it is
my opinion that we should close the ranks and not flee the ship.
I will not comment on whether Cold is a better server than MOO, except to
say that unless there is an easy way to get an existing MOO database to
run under Cold very few of those who run larger MOOs today are going to
switch. Most MOOs that have been around for a while have too much
invested in the database and user base to simply trash it and start over.
Cheers,
Jan@Lingua MOO
__Jan Rune Holmevik, Cand Philol_____________________________________
University of Bergen
Department for Humanistic Informatics jan.holmevik@hedb.uib.no
Sydnesplass 7, HF-bygget janruneh@utdallas.edu
5020 Bergen, NORWAY http://lingua.utdallas.edu
Home |
Subject Index |
Thread Index