Re: FUP and LAG

• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 14:07:05 PST
• From:
  Christopher Scott Delaney <cdelaney@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
• cc: MOO-Cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <199702262131.PAA04214@secretariat.astroarch.com>

Could it be .... your implementation?

The package itself is actually quite useful, when not done over-the-top.  
It caused lag at river for a few weeks until we tracked it down to a huge 
amount of fileread() calls.  We re-implemented those calls with better 
code and voila!  Problem solved.  

Chris

aka: barrett && archwizard @ rivermoo

On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Edward L. Haletky wrote:

> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:31:21 -0800 (PST)
> From: Edward L. Haletky <elh@secretariat.astroarch.com>
> To: MOO-Cows@parc.xerox.com
> Subject: FUP and LAG
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Just a quick note to let you all know that FUP is BAD. We thought it could
> be very useful but it ended up costing us nearly a diskdrive, a few machine
> crashes, and huge amount of lag when being accessed.
> 
> So we ripped it out this AM. Only thing FUP'd now is our Help.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Edward L. Haletky, President            BATS (ISP Billing and Tracking System)
> AstroArch Consulting, Inc.              http://www.tpoint.net/astroarch
> elh@astroarch.com
> 
> 

• FUP and LAG
• From: "Edward L. Haletky" <elh@secretariat.astroarch.com (none)>

• Prev: FUP and LAG
• Next: Re: FUP and LAG
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows