Re: FW: That numeric verb thing again.

• Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 14:32:00 PST
• From:
  hpa@trantor.storm.net (H. Peter Anvin)
• Content-Type: text
• Newsgroups: local.moo
• Organization: Where Stormnet meets the Internet
• References: <01BAFEE2.622D2620@phoenix.clawpaw.com>

In article <01BAFEE2.622D2620@phoenix.clawpaw.com>,
Ron Stanions  <chaeon@roc.clawpaw.com> wrote:
>>
>>Isuggest using the already-unambiguous MOOcode syntax:
>>
>>object:verb OK iff verb doesn't contain " ( )
>>object:("verb") otherwise
>>object:(verbno) for verb numbers
>
>Yes, but for .program this won't work.  if I have two verbs 'l*ook this =
>none none' and 'l*ook none none none' how can I use .program to write =
>the second verb? (without setting the $server_option that is.)
>

I mean, of course, that .program (as well as the emergency wiz mode
things -- not a problem since they use the same decode routine) should
be modified to handle this syntax.

	-hpa
-- 
PGP public key available - finger hpa@terminus.storm.net
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah
GE/CS 3.1 d- s-:- a- C++++ ULIS++++$ P+++ L++++>+++++ E++ W++ N++ o+ K
w--- O@ M V- PGP+ t+ 5++ X? R@ tv- b++ DI++++ D++(+) G e++ h- r-- y-

• Re: FW: That numeric verb thing again.
• From: Rich Connamacher <phantom@baymoo.sfsu.edu>

• FW: That numeric verb thing again.
• From: Ron Stanions <chaeon@roc.clawpaw.com>

• Prev: FW: That numeric verb thing again.
• Next: Re: FW: That numeric verb thing again.
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows