Re: Verb access problem in new server...

• Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:46:25 PST
• From:
  hpa@trantor.storm.net (H. Peter Anvin)
• Content-Type: text
• Newsgroups: local.moo
• Organization: Where Stormnet meets the Internet
• References: <01BAFEC8.3BD159C0@phoenix.clawpaw.com> <Pine.A32.3.91.960219110414.45780H-100000@fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>

In article
<Pine.A32.3.91.960219110414.45780H-100000@fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>,
Graeme Smith  <grysmith@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>How about using the number as an index to verbs(me) might have to add one
>to bring it into alignment. but it should be a simple reference, as long
>as they haven't sorted the verb list....
>> 
>sortof
>
>me:(verbs(me)[x+1])() ?
>

What if there are several verbs named "foo"?  This is not a good
solution.  I say the fact that object:(verbno)(args) doesn't work is
simply a bug.

	-hpa
-- 
PGP public key available - finger hpa@terminus.storm.net
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Bahá'u'lláh
GE/CS 3.1 d- s-:- a- C++++ ULIS++++$ P+++ L++++>+++++ E++ W++ N++ o+ K
w--- O@ M V- PGP+ t+ 5++ X? R@ tv- b++ DI++++ D++(+) G e++ h- r-- y-

• Re: Verb access problem in new server...
• From: Rich Connamacher <phantom@baymoo.sfsu.edu>

• Verb access problem in new server...
• From: Ron Stanions <chaeon@roc.clawpaw.com>
• Re: Verb access problem in new server...
• From: Graeme Smith <grysmith@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>

• Prev: RE: Verb access problem in new server...
• Next: Re: Verb access problem in new server...
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows