Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?

• Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:16:31 PST
• From:
  Nick <masked@peak.org>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Feb 1996 15:19:55 PST." <9602170217.aa22823@usgate.paragraph.com>

>I am not sure if it is a right place to ask, but maybe somebody 
>here will point me a to group discussing issues 
>related to MOO architecture based on VRML 2.0 ?
>
	A friend of mine is working with a coder, designing 
	a protocol to use a MOO server to serve VRML documents
	and surface textures to a special MOO client; So the
	user could get a 3d view of the room they are in and
	of objects present there.


|    Nick A. Rusnov, Tefcos, KSC -><-      | http://www.peak.org/~masked  |
|       Collective Systems Group           |         My opinions.         |
|Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.|   finger for pgp keyblock    |
Archwizard of Retinal Fetish, comming this Summer.

• MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
• From: Dmitri Kondratiev <dima@paragraph.com>

• Prev: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
• Next: Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows