Re: #0:handle_uncaught_error()

• Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:22:46 PST
• From:
  Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>
• Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• In-reply-to: slayer@kaiwan.com's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:33:31 PST" <199602131733.JAA04947@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>

slayer@kaiwan.com writes:
> would it be better to have :handle_uncaught_error() called on the other
> connection object if the object being connected to is not #0?

What object being connected to?  We're talking about arbitrary MOO tasks here.

	Pavel

• #0:handle_uncaught_error()
• From: slayer@kaiwan.com

• Prev: #0:handle_uncaught_error()
• Next: Re: #0:handle_uncaught_error()
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows