MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: anyone ever gotten xerox to clarify the MOO license before?

Canton M. Becker wrote:
> 
> Alien Xfer Protocol v1.b
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 11:24:25 -0700
> To: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
> From: canton <canton@ontology.com>
> Subject: anyone ever gotten xerox to clarify the MOO license before?
> 
> Hiya, Folks.
> 
> Trying to get some sort of a response from Xerox's legal crew to tell us
> whether or not it's okay to use the LambaMOO server software as part of our
> commercial enterprise... Kinda running into a *total* dead end. All they're
> willing to say is that they haven't released the software as per Xerox's
> releasing procedure, and that the licence agreement that accompanies the
> lambdaMOO source code isn't necessarily valid since it probably wasn't
> cleared by them.
> 
> Has anyone else tried to get permission to use LambdaMOO before? Help?
> 
> Thanks a zillion. Reward to anyone who can furnish a document that
> demonstrates that Xerox officially releases the LambdaMOO server
> free-of-charge for whatever purpose. :)
> -canton
> canton@resrocket.com

Sort-of along these lines:

What about LambdaCore?  Who owns the code--Xerox?  Pavel?  The original
programmers?

Not that I want to sell it or make money off it...just being curious.  :)
Follow-Ups: References:
Home | Subject Index | Thread Index