Re: Pueblo.,...

• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 09:55:14 PST
• From:
  cadams@weather.brockport.edu (Chuck Adams)
• Cc: joeshaw@eskimo.com, moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960115143547.15760P-100000@tombstone.sunrem.com> from "Brandon Gillespie" at Jan 15, 96 01:36:09 pm

Brandon Gillespie drew these hieroglyphs:
> 
> > Has anyone taken it upon themself to try to add Pueblo support to MOO? 
> > Has anyone thought about it? Do you even know what Pueblo is? :)
> > I'm curious as to see if anyone has bothered trying it.
> 
> once pueblo supports a standard protocol (such as MCP or VEIL), sure..
> 

Can we even call MCP a "standard"?  According to the draft spec, it
doesn't support multiple streams, and isn't even compatible with MOO
out of the box.  I'm guessing a new spec has been written up since
then, but it certainly doesn't show on JHM, where it's still using
'@@@' as an OOB prefix in the spec.

As for VEIL, we need some examples.  How about showing us what a short
session in VEIL looks like?  (Put it on the page, 'kay?)

And pueblo folks, how 'bout a URL for info, hm?

Thanks.

• Re: Pueblo.,...
• From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com>

• Prev: Re: Pueblo.,...
• Next: Re: Pueblo.,...
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows